I recently received this e-mail from ‘Greg’:
I was wondering if you could elaberate [sic] on the process of contact printing. that is taking a photograph and printing it on transparent paper and some how making it into a dag. i want to do a self portrait and i think thats the only way i can do it is if the picture is already taken and i reproduce it on a dag. thanks
Here is my response concerning my method of making contact prints using modern methods.
1839 tech + 2008 tech
Making a contact-print daguerreotype is little different from making a contact print in the darkroom using traditional processes. Other “alternative processes” viz. Platinum, Palladium, AZO, etc. use enlarged negatives. The chief difference in daguerreotypes is that it is a direct-positive format so we need an enlarged positive instead.
There are two methods for making an enlarged positive: wet and dry.
In a traditional, “wet” darkroom, you would place your film negative in the enlarger and expose onto a fine-grain interpositive film such as Arista Litho. This material works in a similar fashion to B&W VC paper and yields a direct positive transparency. Use contrast filters to lower the contrast to match that of a Becquerel daguerreotype.
The dry method is best described by Dan Burkholder in his groundbreaking 1995 study Making Digital Negatives for Contact Printing (Book & Disk)
“A digital negative is like any other negative except that it’s made using the computer instead of by using wet chemistry in the darkroom. The two common types of digital negatives are imagesetter negs produced by sending a file to a ‘service bureau’ and inkjet negs made using a desktop printer. Recently the term ‘digital negative’ has been used to describe a type of digital capture file. Don’t be confused. We can actually take our real live digital negatives into the darkroom!”
Despite Dan’s intent for making digital negatives, it is perfectly acceptable to chop off the last step and create a digital positive instead.
You will need:
1. A photo printer (I use an Epson R2400)
2. A supply of Pictorico OHP or Ultra Premium OHP Transparency Film
3. Photoshop or other photo editing software
4. Contact Printing Frame
5. Daguerreotype-making stuff/skills
Open your source image in Photoshop and take a look at the curves. Adjust your curves to reduce the contrast a smidge. Experimentation is key here. Remember that daguerreotypes are orthochromatic (insensitive to red) so anything that’s warmer than green/yellow will be quite dark. You may want to desaturate your reds using the channel mixer in order to give them some greater definition in the final product. Dan has elaborate pre-conceived curves for platinum, palladium, etc and a lot of science to back them up but there’s nothing out there for daguerreotypes as far as I know.
Plenty more after the break:
Print out your color transparency onto the OHP film and take it to the darkroom.
Place the transparency in your contact printing frame and then (in the darkroom) place the sensitized daguerreotype face-down onto the transparency. Seal up the contact printing frame by taping a cardboard cover so that you can take the frame out into the sunlight for exposure. You’ll use the cover as a shutter when you’re ready to expose.
The sunlight I use is usually in the 9-10EV range when measured with my Handy Dandy Pentax Digital Spot Meter pointed at a gray card. At this level of light the exposures are usually in the 1-8 second range depending on the density of the image. Again… experimentation is key here. If you’re especially clever and quick with your hands then you can make a stepped exposure on a single plate with multiple exposures.
No matter which method you choose remember that the Becquerel daguerreotype is a low-contrast image. At most you’ll have two-three stops of latitude in your image so adjust your contrast levels accordingly. I use the channel mixer to adjust the image to reach a contrast level that is shallow enough to keep the highlights from solarizing.
Cordially,
Jonathan
So is the (digital) negative actually in physical contact with the sensitised plate?
With Dags being so delicate, how do you ensure that you don’t damage the plate when you remove it?
Can the sensitised plate damage the neg?
Thank you,
Marizu
Yes, the digital negative (interpositive) is in physical contact with the sensitized plate. How do I ensure the plate’s safety? I move slowly and deliberately.
The main risk is wiping or marring the halide layer with a mote of dust sandwiched between the plate and the digital negative. I use a typical darkroom air bulb to fight dust particles.
Just wondering about the quality?
Is it on par with work done in camera?
Also can one not benefit from being able to produce contacts 40 x 40 cm or 16 inch by 16 inch plates. Crazy I know but just wondering.
The quality is good but it is not the same quality as an in-camera daguerreotype. Just like when you enlarge a 35mm negative in the darkroom onto 8×10 paper you see grain and lose sharpness. An enlargement of any kind never looks as good as the contact print. Shooting digitally and printing on OHP yields a fairly low-grain result but you can still tell. You can do a lot to improve the result, however. Don’t contact-print a daguerreotype shot at f/22. Daguerreotypes are hardly ever shot with such a deep depth of field. Shoot a digital image at f/1.8 on a dSLR and you’ll be much more convincing.